Blog: Koblo's little green blog of musical inspiration
A blog about music, society and other things the we care about.![]() |
Feed |
|---|---|
![]() |
Archive |
Recent
- First Koblo YouTu... · 12 days ago
- Our 400th user! · 20 days ago
- User #300 gets a ... · about 1 month ago
- Support · about 1 month ago
- New Koblo Studio ... · about 1 month ago
- Centaurus updated... · 2 months ago
- support forums up... · 2 months ago
- How Koblo Started · 2 months ago
- how to start a fe... · 2 months ago
- what role does ma... · 2 months ago
Most used Tags
koblostudio · koblo · support · inspiration · femaledjlabel · milestone · future · potential · ladyfest · tutorial · new · success · history · jobro · music · frontpage · start · packing · the · update ·Links
what role does mainstream have in a onlinecommunity ?
answer: mainstream doesn't exist in a community - I would even argue that there is no mainstream anymore.
Anyways I have been researching a bit during the last couple of days -and the key that I found was in good'old Chris Andersons book "the long tail" where he basically argues the winning situation the niche's has over mainstream - and he even uses music communities as an example ! -
So the argument is battled between the mainstream hitlist vs. recommendation algorithms in a community.
Somehow as the mainstream disappears, the hitlists becomes irrelevant. Or to put it more clearly - I don't care about a pop chart hitlists if I am into rock'n'roll. Or maybe I do, but I will always get more relevant data if I get a rock'n'roll hitlist..
So RELEVANCY algorithms are key for music communities - as relevancy algorithms are key on amazon.com for books.
so in general hitlists are becoming obsolete - unless they are relevant and "up close" to the users.
it's kindoff the same idea that is spreading like a wildfire through the advertisement industry - to make ads seem like "relevant information" to the users so they wont notise that it's an ad...
smart thinking =)
oh - this is somewhat crossposted on toothlesstiger.com
Comments
To post a comment, please log in.


As to relevancy; in a music community, relevancy should be based upon what the music community does for its users. Plenty of bands think having many thousands of myspace "friends" is helping their career. In reality, it doesn't really help at all. It doesn't sell records very often, and most of the people adding you as a band are other bands.
To me, though, relevancy is achieved when two people or entities come together on the internet. So, if someone visits my Myspace page, likes my music, adds me as a friend _and_ contacts me telling me they like what I do, it's more relevant; we have a connection now, they may buy a record, or we may just become friends in the long run. This happens in probably about 1 out of 10 cases of most online communities, though.
So to close up my little diatribe here, I'd say that to be relevant, you must present relevant data to your users, and that data must be well-generated from your providers (bands are providers, listeners are users). The key is to work with what someone already knows they like, and to show them what else exists within that preconception.
So now we let the community pick what they want !